HANDS OFF 2025 LA On the street and building the beat! CJN -
LA Saturday April 5, 2025 Meeting the People where the Money Meets the Road. Thank you HANDS OFF 50501 Movement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hands_Off_protests
https://www.facebook.com/groups/50501movement/
WP columnist Kathleen Parker puts a sober and fair light on KC kicker Harrison Butker's right to speak his mind about religious interest. He's at a Catholic University, not a woke feminist friendly tea party.
WP Article
Thursday morning Chauven murder trial antics by Prosecutors’ and their “Monday morning quarterbacking,” inspired their attempt to finagle in “new” evidence. Evidence that clearly the Minneapolis ME let slip through the cracks and prosecutions miscalculations of its probative value. Nonetheless, all is swiftly “cross-checked” by the judge Cahill, and not allowed in, else “mistrial.” That’s how good defense counsel and their expert performed.
If Minneapolis prosecutors got any sleep “Thursday” night, it may have consisted of, at the most, a blink or two. After Defense expert witness Dr. Fowler presented substantial “holes” in the tests the ME office presented at trial, and the “absence” thereof suggests much. The prosecution counsel and witnesses are at the mercy ME’s office disclosures. Their attempt to try to bring in “something” that was within in their “records” discovery and availability for months, had judge Cahill pulling in the leash on prosecutors substantially.
The optics for jurors Thursday morning after a good night’s rest, unlike the prosecution’s office, couldn’t have been more exciting than a ride on “Indiana Jones” at Disneyland. Prosecutor’s “steamed” and sweat soak collars couldn’t have been more “noticeably” given the extent to which they were going to need to groom “arguments” for Judge Cahill Thursday morning and hopefully prevail, which they didn't. One can see that in the prosecution presentation and results thereafter. And to further that notion one can be sure the judge’s verbal warning that “mistrial” had prosecutors on eggshells good and plenty. Point being is, that when the jury entrance time was delayed - the “mind” wonders, the jury chats and bonds more, and speculation – conjuncture arises. Senses become more acute, as in, “What’s the delay.” Consider yourself driving a car in a city you have never been in before and you hit a traffic jam? One thinks: “Is there an ‘accident’ up ahead,” and so forth, when in truth – traffic on "that" particular highway always backs up between 9 and 10 am every morning. But a stranger doesn’t know that, and speculations arise. It’s a common human propensity. And given the likelihood of common human “propensities” at hand, and the peculiarities of a “strange” environment,” being in a “jury” pool with a bunch of strangers, on a very “high” profile case, one can understand - it’s not like attending a Minnesota Viking football game with “strangers”, albeit, fans. These are very contrasting “environments” and to think that the jurors, after their, presumably, “good night's” rest Wednesday, are going be on “all fours” with their senses well tuned. Given that, it’s not a reach to suggest they didn’t “sense” the temperature(s) underneath the “collars” of the prosecutor's panel and their Wednesday night war room tactics involving their last minute “Hail-Mary” pass. The jury must have sensed the “immediacy” of the matters at hand, the tension in the room. The combination of factors, physiological factors from being up all night, followed by the sudden warning of “mistrial” by the judge, incubated a degree and level of tension for prosecutors, not even Al Pacino could have danced around.
As we will all see in weeks ahead after the trial when jurors hit the morning AM news circuits, MSNBC and CNN among others, it's very likely jurors will be talking about “Thursday” morning, April 15. They will be talking about what it was like to walk into that courtroom that Thursday morning and the unexpected “Elephant” in the room, after their morning croissants and tea.
It’s not clear whether they will be sequestered immediately, today, or next week after summations. But one can be sure, many are talking about the ME’s office and prosecution’s “big mistake,” news channels and hard copy paper reporters, and it’s likely going to be “water cooler” conversation widely, and substantially have individuals forming an opinion.
It is truly confounding how Madison Avenue Media magnates such as CNN and MSNBC and their reporters are asking pundits, lawyers, legal scholars (willing to sing their chorus) law enforcement professionals “objective questions” about the “trial process” and how evidence works after “they” have spent the last 10 months promoting “street justice” in convicting Derek Chauvin of the “murder” of George Floyd via all their narrow lens, albeit prejudicial and bias investigative reporting. If you haven’t noticed, these networks and their reporters are in a fit of substantial digestive trauma while they learn of what really happened via real-time court room facts, videos and pictures, but that just doesn’t jive with the narrative they wrote and promoted for months. Particularly considering how much these networks both financially benefited from in those events while reporting on the outcomes of the very flames they fanned into being. Flames that brought a lot of overtime money to network staff members, field operations and production crews. Can one begin to think they’d be objective about the efficacy or credibility of the journalistic ethics when it may defeat their financial interest. Not a chance. It’s not 50 years ago on Madison Avenue Media journalism. “Where not in Kansas anymore” folks. But today, what rules is “revenues,” not unlike the very thing they criticize of Fox news. The buck stops here, and right now, their pants are just as far down as the very same ethic injustices they condemn Fox news of.
The truth hurts. And right now, these networks are shaking in their boots, since their credibility and every correspondent that bought in on the mayhem they generated will have substantial “pie on their face” as the “facts” (imagine that CNN/MSNBC) come out. Facts, something they didn’t think about when they wanted to cook another male white supremacist, they seem to have confused in their PTTD (Post Traumatic Trump Disorder), or like confusion. It’s understandable now, that some of the public actually think Derek Chauven went to work May 25, 2020 with the objective to take a man’s life. That is magical thinking. But it’s understandable how a neurosis of this type might manifest itself in a reporter after covering Trump for 4 years. It’s understandable. Nonetheless, both CNN and MSNBC have clearly drank a little too much of their own kool-Aide in recent months. And now they’re wondering about this thing called being “objective” and asking lawyers and legal professionals about court room criminal procedures currently underway, that isn’t exactly lining up with the narrative they’ve contrived over recent months. Clearly, the wind is not going their way and one can sense it in the evening news.
Yet now, the “cross-road” is in sight, and the final deal is about to go down and what may that be? Should Chauven be acquitted on all counts, which is very possible, after a very fair and public trial, and “all the facts” are in, where is MSNBC and CNN going to be when Minnesota burns again, due to a people angered by the system, a system MSNBC and CNN promoted to make a story, a “cause,” yet clearly self-serving in all, in it’s genesis.
Shame on them.
If SCOTUS candidate Amy Coney Barrett were half the Christian she purports to be, she would withdraw her candidacy and let the nation concern itself with more important measures. What good is a court, if you don’t have a country, a nation. One can be sure, right now our country is on the brink of depths it has never known in history.
This suggestion is what any good Christian would do, following in the steps of Christ and Mathew (14:16–21) “Miraculous feeding of a large crowd.” She is being used as a political football in the self-interest of Republicans.
Looking at these pictures, and numerous video cuts to the family during the pre-debate and debate in progress, and the context from which they were taken, could well say much. For those privileged enough to have seen these cuts in real time the night of the debates, while shot live on networks, you may understand, or understood as much.
Ivanka Trump demeanor is clearly off. She appears worried the entire time during debate protocol explanations by Wallace. Clearly, if you saw the cuts to her during his guidelines disclosure, muted to listeners, to other times she was caught on camera by pool producers, she was looking at something she never wanted to know. A dark unknown. Her eyes say very, very much.
The same goes for Donald Jr. He was tighter than an egg on Catfish Friday. And why was that? He notions off to Ivanka after her turn to him as the video indicates, and says much. They're dirty.
The most illuminating of these subjects in this post, is that of the third subject of family attendee photo. Her hands are clenched. Tight. She is not comfortable..???
Forensically speaking. It's conceivable these subjects knew someone, something, was on the wire, handsomely, and all were praying they could get out of Dodge before the sheriff came to town. And much of the disclosure that should come to the vine after this night, and the next day/night may well flush out better the "time-line" of "exposure" and who knew what, and when!
HANDS OFF 2025 LA On the street and building the beat! CJN - LA Saturday April 5, 2025 Meeting the People where the Money Meets the Road. ...
