Liberal Media Promotions Have Their Costs
While MSNBC to CNN, to countless other
liberal media outlets (Syndicate Democrats (SynDems)), join hands and rant, if
not pander to this recent development, the blame game of this unfortunate
circumstance for two illegal immigrants, a father and daughter drowning on the
Rio Grande, they can't, and shouldn’t - blame Trump. They can try, but the
price will soon come back to haunt them, not unlike the HRC 16 wooden nickels
of times past. All the while, as US liberal media syndicates, SynDems,
wave the freedom flag for those in need abroad, these media giant producers or
journalist, thousands of miles away in their Madison Ave towers, who conceivably
never stepped foot in any bordering US or Mexico state, but just the same “waive
in” and fuel these immigrants, albeit into the fire, from afar. And why? For
the sake of “firewood,” that others pay the price for, in their righteous burn,
then conveniently and mindlessly pound the war drums to the tune: “Blame Trump.” Promotions have their cost, particularly when lives are lost.
These SynDems are fueling the potential
demise for the DNC 2020, again, no different than 2016, in their taking Trump “cause
bait” and indulging Trump’s side line wars such as “harsh immigration tactics;”
they need to review Obama’s record. Yet, savvy republican strategist have wisely
implemented these emotional “wars,” in an effort to derail, and engage, the DNC
base and their focus, only to dumbfound all into side-track liberal interest
that were manufactured, viscerally, solely for the purpose to have the base
distracted and foiled, if not constantly disoriented. And most of all, the liberal media, SynDems, takes the
bait handsomely, due to the ink these issues and causes generate, the instant
gratification thereof, and discussion platforms it fuels, while program guests
interns’ phones are ringing off the hook with state legislature(s) PR interns
that want to chime in, air-time, for the sake of ratings despite the demise
they are creating for their base, or constituents, and particularly – “swing
voters.”
CJN concurs with Washington Monthly’s
Martin Longman June 25th assessment
on Charlie Sykes “Dear Democrats, Here’s How to Guarantee Trump’s Reelection.” And with emphasis added, Longman makes clear:
“.. and I don’t normally take advice
from Charlie Sykes, but he’s not wrong about this:
“…Trump could still win reelection, because he has one essential dynamic
working in his favor: You.
Trump’s numbers are unmovable, but yours are not. He doesn’t need to win
this thing; he needs for you to lose it. There are millions of swing voters who
regard Trump as an abomination but might vote for him again if they think you
are scarier, more extreme, dangerous, or just annoyingly out of touch.”
Whose fault would Dems point to, had
the drowned father, Óscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez, instead – decided to
embrace his child as a shield then rob a bank in Mexico City, only to perish in
a hail of hundreds of Federale bullets? Comparatively, who would the SynDems
blame if the father decided to parachute strap his daughter to his side, then
jump from a plane to US fields, and parachute fail on descent from 1500 feet? It is immeasurable the extent to what the DNC
base can be distracted by smartly placed distractions the like of Stephen Miller
or Bannon can divine, while confused swing voter heads are “scratched to the
bone.” Who then, bloody fingers and all, reach for their pocket book – or toss a coin, and mistakenly
assert, “heads you win, tails I lose,” and default to economic determinations
and benefits thereto as a sole basis for how they vote. Not idealistic in the
least. Cold hard facts only. And I’m sorry, “You’re Fired” DNC, and it's "TheirStory," not "HerStory," or history, but the "Buck Stops Here."
SynDems are a very, very powerful
entity in today’s media dissemination. But
lets not forget! In the wee hours of Wednesday November 9, 2016, with bedside celebratory champaign and ice still half full, many a NY times and Washington Post writer
to editor desk was awoken from their HRC dream-dance to rewrite their headlines
and columns, albeit the “real story,” and not HerStory! And what has happened since? Likely enough
ink, in times forward among historians and political science academics to scholars,
perhaps enough ink that could pale the thousands of volumes and pages written to
date on the French and American Revolutions combined. That’s how bad
they had it! But was it enough? Promotions have their costs.
