Liberal Media Promotions Have Their Costs

Liberal Media Promotions Have Their Costs

While MSNBC to CNN, to countless other liberal media outlets (Syndicate Democrats (SynDems)), join hands and rant, if not pander to this recent development, the blame game of this unfortunate circumstance for two illegal immigrants, a father and daughter drowning on the Rio Grande, they can't, and shouldn’t - blame Trump. They can try, but the price will soon come back to haunt them, not unlike the HRC 16 wooden nickels of times past.  All the while, as US liberal media syndicates, SynDems, wave the freedom flag for those in need abroad, these media giant producers or journalist, thousands of miles away in their Madison Ave towers, who conceivably never stepped foot in any bordering US or Mexico state, but just the same “waive in” and fuel these immigrants, albeit into the fire, from afar. And why? For the sake of “firewood,” that others pay the price for, in their righteous burn, then conveniently and mindlessly pound the war drums to the tune: “Blame Trump.” Promotions have their cost, particularly when lives are lost. 

These SynDems are fueling the potential demise for the DNC 2020, again, no different than 2016, in their taking Trump “cause bait” and indulging Trump’s side line wars such as “harsh immigration tactics;” they need to review Obama’s record.  Yet, savvy republican strategist have wisely implemented these emotional “wars,” in an effort to derail, and engage, the DNC base and their focus, only to dumbfound all into side-track liberal interest that were manufactured, viscerally, solely for the purpose to have the base distracted and foiled, if not constantly disoriented.  And most of all, the liberal media, SynDems, takes the bait handsomely, due to the ink these issues and causes generate, the instant gratification thereof, and discussion platforms it fuels, while program guests interns’ phones are ringing off the hook with state legislature(s) PR interns that want to chime in, air-time, for the sake of ratings despite the demise they are creating for their base, or constituents, and particularly – “swing voters.”

CJN concurs with Washington Monthly’s Martin Longman June 25^th assessment  on Charlie Sykes “Dear Democrats, Here’s How to Guarantee Trump’s Reelection.” And with emphasis added, Longman makes clear:

“.. and I don’t normally take advice from Charlie Sykes, but he’s not wrong about this:

“…Trump could still win reelection, because he has one essential dynamic working in his favor: You.

Trump’s numbers are unmovable, but yours are not. He doesn’t need to win this thing; he needs for you to lose it. There are millions of swing voters who regard Trump as an abomination but might vote for him again if they think you are scarier, more extreme, dangerous, or just annoyingly out of touch.”

Whose fault would Dems point to, had the drowned father, Óscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez, instead – decided to embrace his child as a shield then rob a bank in Mexico City, only to perish in a hail of hundreds of Federale bullets? Comparatively, who would the SynDems blame if the father decided to parachute strap his daughter to his side, then jump from a plane to US fields, and parachute fail on descent from 1500 feet?  It is immeasurable the extent to what the DNC base can be distracted by smartly placed distractions the like of Stephen Miller or Bannon can divine, while confused swing voter heads are “scratched to the bone.” Who then, bloody fingers and all, reach for their pocket book – or toss a coin, and mistakenly assert, “heads you win, tails I lose,” and default to economic determinations and benefits thereto as a sole basis for how they vote. Not idealistic in the least. Cold hard facts only. And I’m sorry, “You’re Fired” DNC, and it's   "TheirStory," not "HerStory," or history, but the "Buck Stops Here." 

SynDems are a very, very powerful entity in today’s media dissemination.  But lets not forget! In the wee hours of Wednesday November 9, 2016, with bedside celebratory champaign and ice still half full, many a NY times and Washington Post writer to editor desk was awoken from their HRC dream-dance to rewrite their headlines and columns, albeit the “real story,” and not HerStory!  And what has happened since? Likely enough ink, in times forward among historians and political science academics to scholars, perhaps enough ink that could pale the thousands of volumes and pages written to date on the French and American Revolutions combined. That’s how bad they had it! But was it enough? Promotions have their costs.